INVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 6.57%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.18%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $113.78 which suggests that it could grow by 34.82%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.188%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are smaller than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.79x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 138.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.66x versus 4.05x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of -0.21%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.18%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $129.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.76%. Given that Lamar Advertising has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Lamar Advertising is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.853%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $579.6M. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.79x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 31.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.66x versus 5.17x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 2.01%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 1.04%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.18%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $50.38 which suggests that it could grow by 28.05%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.539%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $258.1M. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.79x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 142.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.66x versus 2.94x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 66.66%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.27%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.18%. On the other hand PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.43 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.955%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust offers a yield of 12.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust pays out 112.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are larger than PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust quarterly revenues of $69.8M. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's net income of $46.5M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.79x while PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's PE ratio is 9.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.66x versus 6.36x for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.