EL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of -14.74% compared to The Estee Lauder Companies's net margin of 11.45%. The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a consensus price target of $76.30, signalling upside risk potential of 10.97%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $163.16 which suggests that it could grow by 10.53%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than Clorox.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.802%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. The Estee Lauder Companies pays 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M is lower than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, The Estee Lauder Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.05x while Clorox's PE ratio is 40.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Estee Lauder Companies is 1.63x versus 2.57x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of -14.74% compared to The Estee Lauder Companies's net margin of 6.7%. The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.75%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a consensus price target of $76.30, signalling upside risk potential of 10.97%. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $169.80 which suggests that it could grow by 48.32%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than The Estee Lauder Companies, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than The Estee Lauder Companies.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.259%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. The Estee Lauder Companies pays 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $361.5M. The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M is lower than Interparfums's net income of $24.2M. Notably, The Estee Lauder Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.05x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 22.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Estee Lauder Companies is 1.63x versus 2.54x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of -14.74% compared to The Estee Lauder Companies's net margin of 5.48%. The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a consensus price target of $76.30, signalling upside risk potential of 10.97%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $162.96 which suggests that it could grow by 9.28%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than PepsiCo.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. The Estee Lauder Companies pays 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, The Estee Lauder Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.05x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Estee Lauder Companies is 1.63x versus 2.24x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of -14.74% compared to The Estee Lauder Companies's net margin of 21.16%. The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a consensus price target of $76.30, signalling upside risk potential of 10.97%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.66 which suggests that it could grow by 5.41%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. The Estee Lauder Companies pays 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, The Estee Lauder Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.05x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Estee Lauder Companies is 1.63x versus 4.96x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.