PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of -3.54%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 5.8%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.86 which suggests that it could grow by 7.75%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.801%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $4.1B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of -$144M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 33.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.24x versus 3.13x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 19.01%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $75.08 which suggests that it could grow by 5.25%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.72%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.24x versus 6.55x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 14.94%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.6754 which suggests that it could fall by -4.52%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.624%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.24x versus 8.03x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 10.52%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 8.35%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $66.75 which suggests that it could grow by 7.75%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.944%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is higher than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $287.8M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 11.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.24x versus 1.12x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.