Is Netflix a Must-own Stock?
The early months of 2025 have been very hard on…
Buy
51
CF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$78.49
Seasonality move
:
4.05%
Day range:
$76.17 - $77.54
52-week range:
$67.34 - $98.25
Dividend yield:
2.59%
P/E ratio:
11.42x
P/S ratio:
2.35x
P/B ratio:
2.63x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
2.7M
1-year change:
-2.46%
Market cap:
$13.1B
Revenue:
$5.9B
EPS (TTM):
$6.77
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CF
CF Industries Holdings
|
$1.5B | $1.50 | 2.3% | 56.41% | $86.68 |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$585.4M | $0.59 | 23.01% | -75.22% | $23.33 |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
$800.1M | $0.60 | 1.56% | 182.87% | $68.00 |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -- | $1.40 |
|
UAN
CVR Partners LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -- | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CF
CF Industries Holdings
|
$77.30 | $86.68 | $13.1B | 11.42x | $0.50 | 2.59% | 2.35x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$17.25 | $23.33 | $1.6B | 5.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.75x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
$62.42 | $68.00 | $1B | 23.38x | $0.77 | 4.93% | 0.33x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
$0.40 | $1.40 | $27M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UAN
CVR Partners LP
|
$77.10 | -- | $814.9M | 13.39x | $1.75 | 8.77% | 1.55x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
$0.63 | $1.50 | $51.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CF
CF Industries Holdings
|
37.34% | 1.182 | 17.37% | 2.47x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
43.2% | 1.049 | 31.67% | 0.49x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
57.93% | 1.074 | 106.4% | 1.17x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | 0.844 | -- | -- |
|
UAN
CVR Partners LP
|
100% | 1.063 | 68.24% | 1.40x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -0.389 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CF
CF Industries Holdings
|
$524M | $403M | 11.14% | 15.3% | 30.71% | $222M |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$66.3M | $49.3M | 31.73% | 60.03% | 8.27% | -$54.6M |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
$104M | $43.2M | 2.54% | 6.41% | 5.15% | -$12.6M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-$186.4K | -$1.2M | -- | -- | -- | -$946.4K |
|
UAN
CVR Partners LP
|
$33.2M | $25.8M | 11.12% | 20.51% | 18.49% | -$5.6M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-$6K | -$1.6M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.7M |
CF Industries Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CF or CENX?
Century Aluminum has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 7.16%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFCF Industries Holdings34.38% $1.89 $10.6B CENXCentury Aluminum10.51% $0.44 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CF or CENX?
CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $86.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 35.27%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFCF Industries Holdings3 15 0 CENXCentury Aluminum2 0 0 -
Is CF or CENX More Risky?
CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CF or CENX?
CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CF or CENX?
CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 5.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.35x versus 0.75x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFCF Industries Holdings2.35x 11.42x $1.5B $328M CENXCentury Aluminum0.75x 5.51x $630.9M $45.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CF or KALU?
Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 2.78%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFCF Industries Holdings34.38% $1.89 $10.6B KALUKaiser Aluminum13.38% $1.31 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CF or KALU?
CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $86.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.94%. Given that CF Industries Holdings has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe CF Industries Holdings is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFCF Industries Holdings3 15 0 KALUKaiser Aluminum1 2 0 -
Is CF or KALU More Risky?
CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.862%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CF or KALU?
CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CF or KALU?
CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 23.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.35x versus 0.33x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFCF Industries Holdings2.35x 11.42x $1.5B $328M KALUKaiser Aluminum0.33x 23.38x $777.4M $21.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CF or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFCF Industries Holdings34.38% $1.89 $10.6B PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -$0.03 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CF or PZG?
CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $86.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 250.61%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFCF Industries Holdings3 15 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada1 0 0 -
Is CF or PZG More Risky?
CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CF or PZG?
CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CF or PZG?
CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.35x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFCF Industries Holdings2.35x 11.42x $1.5B $328M PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -- -- -$2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CF or UAN?
CVR Partners LP has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 13.11%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFCF Industries Holdings34.38% $1.89 $10.6B UANCVR Partners LP23.76% $1.73 $547.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CF or UAN?
CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $86.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand CVR Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -87.68%. Given that CF Industries Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe CF Industries Holdings is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFCF Industries Holdings3 15 0 UANCVR Partners LP0 0 0 -
Is CF or UAN More Risky?
CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.414%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CF or UAN?
CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. CVR Partners LP offers a yield of 8.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Partners LP pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Partners LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CF or UAN?
CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues of $139.6M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while CVR Partners LP's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.35x versus 1.55x for CVR Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFCF Industries Holdings2.35x 11.42x $1.5B $328M UANCVR Partners LP1.55x 13.39x $139.6M $18.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CF or XPL?
Solitario Resources has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFCF Industries Holdings34.38% $1.89 $10.6B XPLSolitario Resources-- -$0.02 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CF or XPL?
CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $86.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.97%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFCF Industries Holdings3 15 0 XPLSolitario Resources0 0 0 -
Is CF or XPL More Risky?
CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CF or XPL?
CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CF or XPL?
CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.35x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFCF Industries Holdings2.35x 11.42x $1.5B $328M XPLSolitario Resources-- -- -- -$1.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…
Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
48
FI alert for Apr 25
Fiserv [FI] is up 0.33% over the past day.
Buy
66
FARO alert for Apr 25
Faro Technologies [FARO] is up 0.93% over the past day.
Buy
55
PI alert for Apr 25
Impinj [PI] is up 2.15% over the past day.
