UAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CF Industries Holdings has a net margin of 13.11% compared to CVR Partners LP's net margin of 21.52%. CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51% beat CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3%.

CVR Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -85.75%. On the other hand CF Industries Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $90.01 which suggests that it could grow by 31.46%. Given that CF Industries Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe CF Industries Holdings is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.893%.

CVR Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. CF Industries Holdings offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CVR Partners LP pays 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings pays out 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Partners LP's is not.

CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues are $139.6M, which are smaller than CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M is lower than CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M. Notably, CVR Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while CF Industries Holdings's PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Partners LP is 1.34x versus 2.08x for CF Industries Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 13.11% compared to CVR Partners LP's net margin of -1.23%. CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

CVR Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -85.75%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CVR Partners LP has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe CVR Partners LP is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.042%.

CVR Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. CVR Partners LP pays 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Partners LP's is not.

CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues are $139.6M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, CVR Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 17.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Partners LP is 1.34x versus 0.21x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 13.11% compared to CVR Partners LP's net margin of --. CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

CVR Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -85.75%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 294.64%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

CVR Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVR Partners LP pays 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues are $139.6M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, CVR Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Partners LP is 1.34x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 13.11% compared to CVR Partners LP's net margin of --. CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

CVR Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -85.75%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 174.22%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

CVR Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.14%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVR Partners LP pays 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues are $139.6M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, CVR Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Partners LP is 1.34x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.