IVFH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of 1.51%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 22.76% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 10.43%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $53.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.95%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.995%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $17M, which are smaller than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $931.5M. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of $1.3M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $14.1M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.97x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 42.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.24x versus 0.64x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of 0.17%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 22.76% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innovative Food Holdings has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Innovative Food Holdings is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.577%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $17M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of $1.3M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.97x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 18.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.24x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 22.76% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.73%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.539%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $17M, which are smaller than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of $1.3M is lower than SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.97x while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 13.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.24x versus 0.07x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -0.27%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 22.76% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $28.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.692%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $17M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of $1.3M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.97x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.24x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.