EVOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of -8772.36% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 4.02%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -44.03% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $193.05 which suggests that it could grow by 30.42%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.228%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $51.9K, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $6.9B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 2,147.35x versus 1.00x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of -8772.36% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 7.81%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -44.03% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $493.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.91%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.602%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $51.9K, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 21.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 2,147.35x versus 1.59x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Controls International PLC has a net margin of -8772.36% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 7.72%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -44.03% beat Johnson Controls International PLC's return on equity of 10.13%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Johnson Controls International PLC has an analysts' consensus of $92.15 which suggests that it could grow by 29.54%. Given that Johnson Controls International PLC has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Controls International PLC is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Controls International PLC has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.862%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Johnson Controls International PLC offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Controls International PLC pays out 58.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Controls International PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $51.9K, which are smaller than Johnson Controls International PLC quarterly revenues of $5.4B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than Johnson Controls International PLC's net income of $419M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Johnson Controls International PLC's PE ratio is 27.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 2,147.35x versus 2.14x for Johnson Controls International PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of -8772.36% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 10.7%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -44.03% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $167.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.68%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.973%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $51.9K, which are smaller than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $533.7M. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 28.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 2,147.35x versus 2.86x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.