SPXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 15.25%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.3%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $74.83 which suggests that it could fall by -7.31%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Fastenal.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.641%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2B. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.7M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.49x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 40.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.18x versus 6.09x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 4.02%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.3%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $193.71 which suggests that it could grow by 14.32%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.228%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $6.9B. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.49x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.18x versus 1.14x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 7.81%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.3%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $497.17 which suggests that it could grow by 25.1%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.602%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.49x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 27.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.18x versus 2.02x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 7.51%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.95%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.3%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than IES Holdings.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.702%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $749.5M. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.49x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 18.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.18x versus 1.37x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.