SPXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 15.61%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $173.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.23%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.71 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Fastenal.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.268%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.49x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 36.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.50x versus 5.60x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 6.05%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $173.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.23%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $218.06 which suggests that it could grow by 26.77%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.356%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $7.8B. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.49x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.50x versus 1.17x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 8.07%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 33.79%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $173.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.23%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $534.40 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.633%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $146.2M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.49x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 34.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.50x versus 2.47x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 8.14%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $173.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.23%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than IES Holdings.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.49x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.50x versus 1.56x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.