TRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 9.07%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.35%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $981M. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 40.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.80x versus 2.67x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 6.31%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 11.9%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Greenbrier Companies has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Greenbrier Companies is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.752%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $875.9M. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 9.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.80x versus 0.49x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FreightCar America has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 25.15%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat FreightCar America's return on equity of --.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand FreightCar America has an analysts' consensus of $14.25 which suggests that it could grow by 116.57%. Given that FreightCar America has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe FreightCar America is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FreightCar America has a beta of 2.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.994%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. FreightCar America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. FreightCar America pays out -36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are larger than FreightCar America quarterly revenues of $137.7M. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than FreightCar America's net income of $34.6M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while FreightCar America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.80x versus 0.37x for FreightCar America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 8.21%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.16%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $215.12 which suggests that it could grow by 20.39%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.649%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $212M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 29.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.80x versus 3.01x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.