SNOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuit has a net margin of -34.42% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 6%. Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9% beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.36%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $184.12, signalling upside risk potential of 14.05%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $728.08 which suggests that it could grow by 14.07%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Snowflake.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M is lower than Intuit's net income of $197M. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 15.73x versus 10.92x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -34.42% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 37.61%. Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $184.12, signalling upside risk potential of 14.05%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.84%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Snowflake.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 15.73x versus 12.79x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of -34.42% compared to Snowflake's net margin of -293.07%. Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $184.12, signalling upside risk potential of 14.05%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of $518.68 which suggests that it could grow by 56.12%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Snowflake.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.477%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are larger than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 15.73x versus 137.78x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -34.42% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 22.41%. Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9% beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $184.12, signalling upside risk potential of 14.05%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.21%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Snowflake.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.915%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 15.73x versus 8.75x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.