OMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of 13.49% compared to OneMain Holdings's net margin of 7.74%. OneMain Holdings's return on equity of 17.27% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32%.

OneMain Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $135.20 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than OneMain Holdings, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than OneMain Holdings.

OneMain Holdings has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.789%.

OneMain Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.85%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. OneMain Holdings pays 75.98% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneMain Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $837.3M. OneMain Holdings's net income of $157M is higher than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M. Notably, OneMain Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneMain Holdings is 1.42x versus 1.44x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of 13.49% compared to OneMain Holdings's net margin of -13.48%. OneMain Holdings's return on equity of 17.27% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -25.87%.

OneMain Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OneMain Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe OneMain Holdings is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

OneMain Holdings has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.536%.

OneMain Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.85%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneMain Holdings pays 75.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneMain Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneMain Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.3M. OneMain Holdings's net income of $157M is higher than Old Market Capital's net income of -$451K. Notably, OneMain Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneMain Holdings is 1.42x versus -- for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of 13.49% compared to OneMain Holdings's net margin of -11.76%. OneMain Holdings's return on equity of 17.27% beat SLM's return on equity of 32.57%.

OneMain Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.77%. Given that OneMain Holdings has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe OneMain Holdings is more attractive than SLM.

OneMain Holdings has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.785%.

OneMain Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.85%. SLM offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. OneMain Holdings pays 75.98% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneMain Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than SLM quarterly revenues of $383.9M. OneMain Holdings's net income of $157M is higher than SLM's net income of -$45.2M. Notably, OneMain Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while SLM's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneMain Holdings is 1.42x versus 3.21x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

World Acceptance has a net margin of 13.49% compared to OneMain Holdings's net margin of 18.3%. OneMain Holdings's return on equity of 17.27% beat World Acceptance's return on equity of 20.13%.

OneMain Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.99%. On the other hand World Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of $137.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.79%. Given that OneMain Holdings has higher upside potential than World Acceptance, analysts believe OneMain Holdings is more attractive than World Acceptance.

OneMain Holdings has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison World Acceptance has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.997%.

OneMain Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.85%. World Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneMain Holdings pays 75.98% of its earnings as a dividend. World Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneMain Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneMain Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than World Acceptance quarterly revenues of $121M. OneMain Holdings's net income of $157M is higher than World Acceptance's net income of $22.1M. Notably, OneMain Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while World Acceptance's PE ratio is 7.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneMain Holdings is 1.42x versus 1.25x for World Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.