SLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EZCORP has a net margin of -11.76% compared to SLM's net margin of 5.16%. SLM's return on equity of 32.57% beat EZCORP's return on equity of 10.58%.

SLM has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand EZCORP has an analysts' consensus of $15.83 which suggests that it could grow by 30.21%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than SLM.

SLM has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EZCORP has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.528%.

SLM has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. EZCORP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SLM pays 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. EZCORP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLM quarterly revenues are $383.9M, which are larger than EZCORP quarterly revenues of $294.6M. SLM's net income of -$45.2M is lower than EZCORP's net income of $15.2M. Notably, SLM's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while EZCORP's PE ratio is 10.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLM is 3.26x versus 0.88x for EZCORP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of -11.76% compared to SLM's net margin of 7.74%. SLM's return on equity of 32.57% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32%.

SLM has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $135.20 which suggests that it could grow by 26.75%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than SLM.

SLM has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.789%.

SLM has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. SLM pays 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLM quarterly revenues are $383.9M, which are smaller than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $837.3M. SLM's net income of -$45.2M is lower than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M. Notably, SLM's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLM is 3.26x versus 1.44x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of -11.76% compared to SLM's net margin of -13.48%. SLM's return on equity of 32.57% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -25.87%.

SLM has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SLM has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe SLM is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

SLM has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.536%.

SLM has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SLM pays 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLM quarterly revenues are $383.9M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.3M. SLM's net income of -$45.2M is lower than Old Market Capital's net income of -$451K. Notably, SLM's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLM is 3.26x versus -- for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upstart Holdings has a net margin of -11.76% compared to SLM's net margin of -4.17%. SLM's return on equity of 32.57% beat Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -27.32%.

SLM has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand Upstart Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $58.29 which suggests that it could grow by 2.08%. Given that SLM has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, analysts believe SLM is more attractive than Upstart Holdings.

SLM has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SLM has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Upstart Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SLM pays 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Upstart Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLM quarterly revenues are $383.9M, which are larger than Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues of $162.1M. SLM's net income of -$45.2M is lower than Upstart Holdings's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, SLM's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Upstart Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLM is 3.26x versus 9.58x for Upstart Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.