OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -0.13%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 11.15%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $16.40 which suggests that it could grow by 38.28%. Given that Core Laboratories has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Core Laboratories is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 1.994, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.433%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $123.6M. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of -$154K. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.67x versus 1.09x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 3.77%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $30.04 which suggests that it could grow by 44.1%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.67x versus 0.81x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 16.91%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.07 which suggests that it could grow by 12.01%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.67x versus 3.85x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of --. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 53.78%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is lower than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.67x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.