OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 8.74%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 10.93%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $28.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $20.71 which suggests that it could grow by 4.45%. Given that Core Laboratories has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Core Laboratories is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.407, which suggesting that the stock is 140.694% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.847%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.10x versus 1.69x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 16.9%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.01%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $28.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $26.53 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Kinder Morgan has more downside risk than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.407, which suggesting that the stock is 140.694% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.748%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 105.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $625M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.10x versus 4.08x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -7.34%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $28.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could fall by -24.24%. Given that Nine Energy Service has more downside risk than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.407, which suggesting that the stock is 140.694% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 253.637%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $138.2M. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.10x versus 0.08x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProPetro Holding has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -37.98%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.27%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $28.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand ProPetro Holding has an analysts' consensus of $10.94 which suggests that it could grow by 7.09%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.407, which suggesting that the stock is 140.694% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.314%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProPetro Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProPetro Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are larger than ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues of $360.9M. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is higher than ProPetro Holding's net income of -$137.1M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while ProPetro Holding's PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.10x versus 0.73x for ProPetro Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.