MSCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Morningstar has a net margin of 41.09% compared to MSCI's net margin of 19.78%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $635.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.29%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $346.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26.82%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.086%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $743.5M, which are larger than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $591M. MSCI's net income of $305.5M is higher than Morningstar's net income of $116.9M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 31.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 14.98x versus 5.18x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 41.09% compared to MSCI's net margin of 17.49%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $635.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.29%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.06 which suggests that it could grow by 17.51%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.075%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $743.5M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2B. MSCI's net income of $305.5M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $355M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 37.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 14.98x versus 5.60x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 41.09% compared to MSCI's net margin of 24.5%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $635.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.29%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $593.82 which suggests that it could grow by 29.72%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.168%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $743.5M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. MSCI's net income of $305.5M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $880M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 37.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 14.98x versus 10.05x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Value Line has a net margin of 41.09% compared to MSCI's net margin of 57.58%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Value Line's return on equity of 22.91%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $635.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.29%. On the other hand Value Line has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Value Line.

MSCI has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Line has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.761%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Value Line offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line pays out 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $743.5M, which are larger than Value Line quarterly revenues of $9M. MSCI's net income of $305.5M is higher than Value Line's net income of $5.2M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Value Line's PE ratio is 17.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 14.98x versus 10.50x for Value Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.