NDAQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 17.49% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 57.34%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.94%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.51%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $266.35 which suggests that it could grow by 1.84%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than CME Group.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.427, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.303%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. CME Group offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Nasdaq's net income of $355M is lower than CME Group's net income of $874.6M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.26x while CME Group's PE ratio is 27.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.60x versus 15.36x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 17.49% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 25.39%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19% beat FactSet Research Systems's return on equity of 28.1%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.51%. On the other hand FactSet Research Systems has an analysts' consensus of $442.16 which suggests that it could grow by 3.93%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than FactSet Research Systems, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than FactSet Research Systems.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.556%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. FactSet Research Systems offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than FactSet Research Systems quarterly revenues of $570.7M. Nasdaq's net income of $355M is higher than FactSet Research Systems's net income of $144.9M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.26x while FactSet Research Systems's PE ratio is 30.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.60x versus 7.28x for FactSet Research Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 17.49% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 23.04%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.51%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $188.31 which suggests that it could grow by 20.78%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.398%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3B. Nasdaq's net income of $355M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.26x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 32.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.60x versus 7.63x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 17.49% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 23.62%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.32%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.51%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $520.96 which suggests that it could grow by 21.6%. Given that Moodys has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Moodys is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.384%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Nasdaq's net income of $355M is lower than Moodys's net income of $395M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.26x while Moodys's PE ratio is 38.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.60x versus 11.04x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.