CRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ATI has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 11.69%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat ATI's return on equity of 22.46%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand ATI has an analysts' consensus of $74.44 which suggests that it could grow by 44.61%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATI has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.156%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. ATI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. ATI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are smaller than ATI quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is lower than ATI's net income of $137.1M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.62x while ATI's PE ratio is 20.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.23x versus 1.73x for ATI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boeing has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of -25.36%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $195.81 which suggests that it could grow by 21.01%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Boeing.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.692%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$3.9B. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.62x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.23x versus 1.57x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Bird has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 9.15%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand Blue Bird has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.7%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.707%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Blue Bird offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Bird pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are larger than Blue Bird quarterly revenues of $313.9M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is higher than Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.62x while Blue Bird's PE ratio is 10.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.23x versus 0.85x for Blue Bird. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 8.2%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $257.58 which suggests that it could grow by 22.04%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.218%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.62x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.23x versus 1.89x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.