CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of 3.35%. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -29.29%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 96.85%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Cango's net income of $7.8M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.93x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of 0.81%. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat H World Group's return on equity of 24.59%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -29.29%. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.68 which suggests that it could grow by 32.4%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.938%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $837.1M. Cango's net income of $7.8M is higher than H World Group's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while H World Group's PE ratio is 25.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.93x versus 3.29x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of --. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -29.29%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1237.09%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.341, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.939%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are larger than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Cango's net income of $7.8M is higher than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.93x versus 0.98x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vipshop Holdings has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of 7.36%. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 19.51%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -29.29%. On the other hand Vipshop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.54 which suggests that it could grow by 24.9%. Given that Vipshop Holdings has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Vipshop Holdings is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.673%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vipshop Holdings offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vipshop Holdings pays out 21.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Vipshop Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are smaller than Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Cango's net income of $7.8M is lower than Vipshop Holdings's net income of $340.1M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while Vipshop Holdings's PE ratio is 6.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.93x versus 0.47x for Vipshop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.