HTHT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baozun has a net margin of 0.81% compared to H World Group's net margin of 0%. H World Group's return on equity of 24.59% beat Baozun's return on equity of -3.18%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.58%. On the other hand Baozun has an analysts' consensus of $3.97 which suggests that it could grow by 77.24%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than H World Group.

H World Group has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baozun has a beta of 0.390, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.958%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Baozun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H World Group pays 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Baozun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $837.1M, which are larger than Baozun quarterly revenues of $416.2M. H World Group's net income of $6.8M is higher than Baozun's net income of $17.9K. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.14x while Baozun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.41x versus 0.10x for Baozun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 0.81% compared to H World Group's net margin of 3.35%. H World Group's return on equity of 24.59% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.58%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 108.33%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than H World Group.

H World Group has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. H World Group pays 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but H World Group's is not.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $837.1M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. H World Group's net income of $6.8M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.14x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.41x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.81% compared to H World Group's net margin of -13.73%. H World Group's return on equity of 24.59% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.58%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 334.78%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than H World Group.

H World Group has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.258%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H World Group pays 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $837.1M, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. H World Group's net income of $6.8M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.14x while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.41x versus 0.73x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 0.81% compared to H World Group's net margin of 16.93%. H World Group's return on equity of 24.59% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.58%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $73.25 which suggests that it could grow by 33.55%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than H World Group.

H World Group has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.112%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. H World Group pays 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $837.1M, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. H World Group's net income of $6.8M is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.14x while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.41x versus 5.15x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.