BLDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 4.95%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 23.7% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $179.39, signalling upside risk potential of 44.08%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $383.49 which suggests that it could grow by 22.12%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Cummins.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.194, which suggesting that the stock is 119.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.2%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $190.2M is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while Cummins's PE ratio is 11.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.90x versus 1.28x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 9.07%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 23.7% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $179.39, signalling upside risk potential of 44.08%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.23%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.194, which suggesting that the stock is 119.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.983%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $981M. Builders FirstSource's net income of $190.2M is higher than Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 41.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.90x versus 2.72x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 17.57%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 23.7% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $179.39, signalling upside risk potential of 44.08%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $227.46 which suggests that it could grow by 13.8%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.194, which suggesting that the stock is 119.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.166%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $190.2M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 33.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.90x versus 4.78x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 15.38%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 23.7% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $179.39, signalling upside risk potential of 44.08%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $252.06 which suggests that it could grow by 25.74%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Nordson.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.194, which suggesting that the stock is 119.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.715%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. Builders FirstSource's net income of $190.2M is higher than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.90x versus 4.32x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.