BILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of 2.49% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 10.87%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.2% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 20.2%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $92.46, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $213.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.65%. Given that Paylocity Holding has higher upside potential than BILL Holdings, analysts believe Paylocity Holding is more attractive than BILL Holdings.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.638%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.5M, which are larger than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $317.6M. BILL Holdings's net income of $8.9M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $34.5M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 54.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 7.17x versus 8.06x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 2.49% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of -34.42%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.2% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $92.46, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $184.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than BILL Holdings, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than BILL Holdings.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.5M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $942.1M. BILL Holdings's net income of $8.9M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 7.17x versus 15.73x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Block has a net margin of 2.49% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 4.75%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.2% beat Block's return on equity of 5.56%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $92.46, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Block has an analysts' consensus of $97.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.83%. Given that Block has higher upside potential than BILL Holdings, analysts believe Block is more attractive than BILL Holdings.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Block has a beta of 2.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.791%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Block offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Block pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.5M, which are smaller than Block quarterly revenues of $6B. BILL Holdings's net income of $8.9M is lower than Block's net income of $283.8M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Block's PE ratio is 53.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 7.17x versus 2.38x for Block. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workiva has a net margin of 2.49% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of -9.15%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.2% beat Workiva's return on equity of --.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $92.46, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Workiva has an analysts' consensus of $120.38 which suggests that it could grow by 7.81%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than BILL Holdings, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than BILL Holdings.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workiva has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.387%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workiva offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workiva pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.5M, which are larger than Workiva quarterly revenues of $185.6M. BILL Holdings's net income of $8.9M is higher than Workiva's net income of -$17M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workiva's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 7.17x versus 8.71x for Workiva. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.