ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -189.45%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.587%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 2.24x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 10.52%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $492.57 which suggests that it could grow by 4.26%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Deere &.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.365%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 2.77x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 10.32%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $138.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.73%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.587%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $166.3M. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $17.2M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 2.28x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 0.35%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat Titan International's return on equity of -0.99%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 43.35%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.099%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are larger than Titan International quarterly revenues of $383.6M. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is higher than Titan International's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 0.33x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.