ZDGE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Groupon has a net margin of -4.71% compared to Zedge's net margin of 12.17%. Zedge's return on equity of -29.39% beat Groupon's return on equity of 297.62%.

Zedge has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 56.86%. On the other hand Groupon has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.48%. Given that Zedge has higher upside potential than Groupon, analysts believe Zedge is more attractive than Groupon.

Zedge has a beta of 1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 24.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Groupon has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.326%.

Zedge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Groupon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zedge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Groupon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zedge quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Groupon quarterly revenues of $114.5M. Zedge's net income of -$339K is lower than Groupon's net income of $13.9M. Notably, Zedge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Groupon's PE ratio is 18.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zedge is 1.20x versus 0.94x for Groupon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -4.71% compared to Zedge's net margin of 38.65%. Zedge's return on equity of -29.39% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21%.

Zedge has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 56.86%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $659.47 which suggests that it could grow by 7.98%. Given that Zedge has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Zedge is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Zedge has a beta of 1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 24.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.168%.

Zedge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Zedge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zedge quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $40.6B. Zedge's net income of -$339K is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B. Notably, Zedge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zedge is 1.20x versus 10.24x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of -4.71% compared to Zedge's net margin of -68.53%. Zedge's return on equity of -29.39% beat comScore's return on equity of -108.24%.

Zedge has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 56.86%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.86%. Given that Zedge has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe Zedge is more attractive than comScore.

Zedge has a beta of 1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 24.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.087%.

Zedge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zedge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zedge quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than comScore quarterly revenues of $88.5M. Zedge's net income of -$339K is higher than comScore's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, Zedge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zedge is 1.20x versus 0.09x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thryv Holdings has a net margin of -4.71% compared to Zedge's net margin of -53.42%. Zedge's return on equity of -29.39% beat Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -170.77%.

Zedge has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 56.86%. On the other hand Thryv Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 78.45%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Zedge.

Zedge has a beta of 1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 24.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thryv Holdings has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.98%.

Zedge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thryv Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zedge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thryv Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zedge quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues of $179.9M. Zedge's net income of -$339K is higher than Thryv Holdings's net income of -$96.1M. Notably, Zedge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thryv Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zedge is 1.20x versus 0.61x for Thryv Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.