MSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Turtle Beach has a net margin of -32.18% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of 3.62%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06% beat Turtle Beach's return on equity of 4.69%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1049.16%. On the other hand Turtle Beach has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 33.56%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Turtle Beach, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Turtle Beach.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Turtle Beach has a beta of 2.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.27%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Turtle Beach offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Turtle Beach pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Turtle Beach quarterly revenues of $94.4M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K is lower than Turtle Beach's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Turtle Beach's PE ratio is 52.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.94x versus 1.07x for Turtle Beach. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koss has a net margin of -32.18% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of -13.1%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06% beat Koss's return on equity of -3.57%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1049.16%. On the other hand Koss has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Koss, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Koss.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koss has a beta of -0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.012%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koss offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koss pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Koss quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K is lower than Koss's net income of -$419.5K. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Koss's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.94x versus 5.88x for Koss. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Algorhythm Holdings has a net margin of -32.18% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of 11.25%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06% beat Algorhythm Holdings's return on equity of -136.66%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1049.16%. On the other hand Algorhythm Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2662.43%. Given that Algorhythm Holdings has higher upside potential than Emerson Radio, analysts believe Algorhythm Holdings is more attractive than Emerson Radio.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Algorhythm Holdings has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.32%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Algorhythm Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Algorhythm Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Algorhythm Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K is lower than Algorhythm Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Algorhythm Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.94x versus 0.03x for Algorhythm Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Electronics has a net margin of -32.18% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of -2.6%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06% beat Universal Electronics's return on equity of -15.63%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1049.16%. On the other hand Universal Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 37.42%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Universal Electronics, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Universal Electronics.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.452%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Universal Electronics quarterly revenues of $102.1M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K is higher than Universal Electronics's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Universal Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.94x versus 0.35x for Universal Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.