AXIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koss has a net margin of -1.88% compared to AXIL Brands's net margin of -13.1%. AXIL Brands's return on equity of 22.19% beat Koss's return on equity of -3.57%.

AXIL Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koss has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AXIL Brands has higher upside potential than Koss, analysts believe AXIL Brands is more attractive than Koss.

AXIL Brands has a beta of -0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koss has a beta of -0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.012%.

AXIL Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koss offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AXIL Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koss pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AXIL Brands quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Koss quarterly revenues of $3.2M. AXIL Brands's net income of -$109.8K is higher than Koss's net income of -$419.5K. Notably, AXIL Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Koss's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXIL Brands is 1.85x versus 5.88x for Koss. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of -1.88% compared to AXIL Brands's net margin of -32.18%. AXIL Brands's return on equity of 22.19% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06%.

AXIL Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1049.16%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than AXIL Brands, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than AXIL Brands.

AXIL Brands has a beta of -0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.088%.

AXIL Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AXIL Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AXIL Brands quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $2.7M. AXIL Brands's net income of -$109.8K is higher than Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K. Notably, AXIL Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXIL Brands is 1.85x versus 0.94x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Algorhythm Holdings has a net margin of -1.88% compared to AXIL Brands's net margin of 11.25%. AXIL Brands's return on equity of 22.19% beat Algorhythm Holdings's return on equity of -136.66%.

AXIL Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Algorhythm Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2662.43%. Given that Algorhythm Holdings has higher upside potential than AXIL Brands, analysts believe Algorhythm Holdings is more attractive than AXIL Brands.

AXIL Brands has a beta of -0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Algorhythm Holdings has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.32%.

AXIL Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Algorhythm Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AXIL Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Algorhythm Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AXIL Brands quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Algorhythm Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. AXIL Brands's net income of -$109.8K is lower than Algorhythm Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, AXIL Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Algorhythm Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXIL Brands is 1.85x versus 0.03x for Algorhythm Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Electronics has a net margin of -1.88% compared to AXIL Brands's net margin of -2.6%. AXIL Brands's return on equity of 22.19% beat Universal Electronics's return on equity of -15.63%.

AXIL Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 37.42%. Given that Universal Electronics has higher upside potential than AXIL Brands, analysts believe Universal Electronics is more attractive than AXIL Brands.

AXIL Brands has a beta of -0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 164.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.452%.

AXIL Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AXIL Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AXIL Brands quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Universal Electronics quarterly revenues of $102.1M. AXIL Brands's net income of -$109.8K is higher than Universal Electronics's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, AXIL Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Universal Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXIL Brands is 1.85x versus 0.35x for Universal Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.