TXRH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 3.47%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 36.82%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $196.03, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $49.41 which suggests that it could fall by -0.14%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.269%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 52.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $865.5M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $30M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.43x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 18.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.40x versus 0.68x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 7.44%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $196.03, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $193.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.23%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.638%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.43x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.40x versus 1.94x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 3.38%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $196.03, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $113.38 which suggests that it could fall by -15.91%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Brinker International.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.43x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 34.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.40x versus 1.42x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 15.84%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $196.03, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $363.40 which suggests that it could grow by 21.94%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.73%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $162.5M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.43x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 86.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.40x versus 14.85x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.