DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 2.34%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 8.07%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $207.76, signalling upside risk potential of 6.84%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has an analysts' consensus of $47.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.42%. Given that Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Cracker Barrel Old Country Store is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.396, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.575%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 283.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's is not.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store quarterly revenues of $949.4M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's net income of $22.2M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's PE ratio is 25.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.97x versus 0.26x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.73%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $207.76, signalling upside risk potential of 6.84%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $179.56 which suggests that it could grow by 24.9%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.618%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 24.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.97x versus 1.37x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 16.53%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $207.76, signalling upside risk potential of 6.84%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $307.09 which suggests that it could grow by 29.41%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.691%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 63.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.97x versus 11.14x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 17.91%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $207.76, signalling upside risk potential of 6.84%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $155.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.487%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $423M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 27.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.97x versus 5.48x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.