TOUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of -23.56% compared to Tuniu's net margin of -13.73%. Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

Tuniu has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 334.78%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Tuniu.

Tuniu has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.258%.

Tuniu has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tuniu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tuniu quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Tuniu's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.90x while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tuniu is 1.47x versus 0.73x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto has a net margin of -23.56% compared to Tuniu's net margin of 7.96%. Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.36%.

Tuniu has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.11 which suggests that it could grow by 45.69%. Given that Tuniu has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe Tuniu is more attractive than Li Auto.

Tuniu has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tuniu has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tuniu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tuniu quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $489.6M. Notably, Tuniu's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.90x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tuniu is 1.47x versus 1.20x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of -23.56% compared to Tuniu's net margin of --. Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57% beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Tuniu has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1322.29%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Tuniu.

Tuniu has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.341, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.939%.

Tuniu has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tuniu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tuniu quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are larger than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M is higher than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Tuniu's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.90x while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tuniu is 1.47x versus 0.92x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uxin has a net margin of -23.56% compared to Tuniu's net margin of -12.24%. Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57% beat Uxin's return on equity of --.

Tuniu has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Uxin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1001.75%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Tuniu.

Tuniu has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.856%.

Tuniu has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.14%. Uxin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tuniu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tuniu quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are smaller than Uxin quarterly revenues of $69.4M. Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Uxin's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Tuniu's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.90x while Uxin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tuniu is 1.47x versus 2.56x for Uxin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.