PTEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Corp (bry) has a net margin of -72.12% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 37.9%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89% beat Berry Corp (bry)'s return on equity of 11.74%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 25.29%. On the other hand Berry Corp (bry) has an analysts' consensus of $6.34 which suggests that it could grow by 45.08%. Given that Berry Corp (bry) has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Berry Corp (bry) is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Corp (bry) has a beta of 1.644, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.418%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Berry Corp (bry) offers a yield of 13.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Corp (bry) pays out 209.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp (bry)'s is not.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Berry Corp (bry) quarterly revenues of $184.4M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M is lower than Berry Corp (bry)'s net income of $69.9M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Berry Corp (bry)'s PE ratio is 4.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.60x versus 0.42x for Berry Corp (bry). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of -72.12% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 10.02%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 25.29%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.06 which suggests that it could grow by 33.55%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.19%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.60x versus 1.07x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of -72.12% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 10.88%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 12.2%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 25.29%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $40.86 which suggests that it could grow by 22.32%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.18%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 4.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $693.8M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 9.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.60x versus 1.20x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of -72.12% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 12.95%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 25.29%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $55.49 which suggests that it could grow by 40.96%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.415%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 12.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.60x versus 1.58x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.