PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 16.54%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.98, signalling upside risk potential of 24.96%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $203.6836 which suggests that it could grow by 47.39%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.887%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is lower than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.64x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 18.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.04x versus 4.15x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

A10 Networks has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 24.66%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.09%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.98, signalling upside risk potential of 24.96%. On the other hand A10 Networks has an analysts' consensus of $22.75 which suggests that it could grow by 45.09%. Given that A10 Networks has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe A10 Networks is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A10 Networks has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.926%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. A10 Networks offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks pays out 35.5% of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than A10 Networks quarterly revenues of $74.2M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than A10 Networks's net income of $18.3M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.64x while A10 Networks's PE ratio is 23.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.04x versus 4.51x for A10 Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ServiceNow has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 12.99%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.98, signalling upside risk potential of 24.96%. On the other hand ServiceNow has an analysts' consensus of $1,061.94 which suggests that it could grow by 33.3%. Given that ServiceNow has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ServiceNow has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.957%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ServiceNow offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ServiceNow pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than ServiceNow quarterly revenues of $3B. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is lower than ServiceNow's net income of $384M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.64x while ServiceNow's PE ratio is 116.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.04x versus 15.12x for ServiceNow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 0.79%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.98, signalling upside risk potential of 24.96%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $46.60 which suggests that it could grow by 45.76%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.462%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $235.7M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.64x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.04x versus 4.22x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.