LAND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bluerock Homes Trust has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -4.67%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of 1.88% beat Bluerock Homes Trust's return on equity of 0.01%.

Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $12.90, signalling upside risk potential of 36.08%. On the other hand Bluerock Homes Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gladstone Land has higher upside potential than Bluerock Homes Trust, analysts believe Gladstone Land is more attractive than Bluerock Homes Trust.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluerock Homes Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gladstone Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Bluerock Homes Trust offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Gladstone Land pays 333.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust pays out 22925% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Land quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are larger than Bluerock Homes Trust quarterly revenues of $13.8M. Gladstone Land's net income of $540K is higher than Bluerock Homes Trust's net income of -$645K. Notably, Gladstone Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 212.67x while Bluerock Homes Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Land is 3.99x versus 0.73x for Bluerock Homes Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of 56.96%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of 1.88% beat Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 12.73%.

Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $12.90, signalling upside risk potential of 36.08%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.15%. Given that Gladstone Land has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Gladstone Land is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gladstone Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance offers a yield of 13.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Gladstone Land pays 333.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays out 112.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Land quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are larger than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues of $13.9M. Gladstone Land's net income of $540K is lower than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $7.9M. Notably, Gladstone Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 212.67x while Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's PE ratio is 7.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Land is 3.99x versus 4.98x for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of 71.98%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of 1.88% beat Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.52%.

Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $12.90, signalling upside risk potential of 36.08%. On the other hand Seven Hills Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 27.22%. Given that Gladstone Land has higher upside potential than Seven Hills Realty Trust, analysts believe Gladstone Land is more attractive than Seven Hills Realty Trust.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.514%.

Gladstone Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Seven Hills Realty Trust offers a yield of 12.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Gladstone Land pays 333.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays out 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Land quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are larger than Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $6.5M. Gladstone Land's net income of $540K is lower than Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Gladstone Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 212.67x while Seven Hills Realty Trust's PE ratio is 9.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Land is 3.99x versus 5.72x for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of 4.81%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of 1.88% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $12.90, signalling upside risk potential of 36.08%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 32.1%. Given that Gladstone Land has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe Gladstone Land is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gladstone Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Gladstone Land pays 333.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Gladstone Land's is not.

Gladstone Land quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are smaller than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Gladstone Land's net income of $540K is lower than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Gladstone Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 212.67x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Land is 3.99x versus 0.64x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.