IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 6.08%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.83%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.3%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.03x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 9.02%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.83%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.28%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.283%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 99.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.03x versus 7.15x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -4.06%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.83%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.25 which suggests that it could grow by 24.14%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.754%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $227.1M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.03x versus 5.26x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -2.6%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.83%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -34.26%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Upland Software.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.03x versus 0.48x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.