IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 11.84%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.43%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $213.14 which suggests that it could grow by 26.61%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.483%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 94.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.32x versus 13.92x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 4.72%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.43%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.23%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.524%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while ePlus's PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.32x versus 0.73x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 4.41%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.43%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.13%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Red Violet.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.262%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 71.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.32x versus 6.84x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -5.04%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.43%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 72.76%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.848%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.32x versus 0.25x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.