ERIE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 44.89% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of -65.47%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Erie Indemnity has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Erie Indemnity has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Erie Indemnity is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.817, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.331%.

Erie Indemnity has a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Erie Indemnity pays 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues are $338.7M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Erie Indemnity's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Erie Indemnity is 5.53x versus 0.56x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 44.89% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 6.77%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Erie Indemnity has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $96.60 which suggests that it could fall by -14.03%. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Erie Indemnity has a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Erie Indemnity pays 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues are $338.7M, which are larger than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M is higher than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Erie Indemnity's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Root's PE ratio is 65.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Erie Indemnity is 5.53x versus 1.52x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 44.89% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 4.73%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Erie Indemnity has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.38 which suggests that it could grow by 15.82%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Erie Indemnity has a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Erie Indemnity pays 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues are $338.7M, which are larger than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Erie Indemnity's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Erie Indemnity is 5.53x versus 1.78x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 44.89% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 0.49%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Erie Indemnity has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 53.17%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.468%.

Erie Indemnity has a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Erie Indemnity pays 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues are $338.7M, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Erie Indemnity's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Erie Indemnity is 5.53x versus 1.13x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.