ACT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 58.36% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 13.04%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.42% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.851%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. Enact Holdings pays 32% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $309.6M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Enact Holdings's net income of $180.7M is higher than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 39.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.33x versus 5.93x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 58.36% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of -65.47%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.42% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.355%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 32% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $309.6M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Enact Holdings's net income of $180.7M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.33x versus 0.38x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 58.36% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 7.46%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.42% beat Root's return on equity of -9.03%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.21%. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 32% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $309.6M, which are larger than Root quarterly revenues of $305.7M. Enact Holdings's net income of $180.7M is higher than Root's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while Root's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.33x versus 1.06x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 58.36% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 12.14%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.42% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.14%. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 32% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $309.6M, which are larger than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $302M. Enact Holdings's net income of $180.7M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.33x versus 1.87x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.