CRWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 34.62%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.86, signalling upside risk potential of 8.46%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $499.16 which suggests that it could grow by 28.5%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 23.75x versus 11.09x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of -2.79%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.86, signalling upside risk potential of 8.46%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $140.22 which suggests that it could grow by 31.97%. Given that Cloudflare has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Cloudflare is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 23.75x versus 21.73x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 3.37%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.86, signalling upside risk potential of 8.46%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $117.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.19%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.826%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Okta's PE ratio is 2,545.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 23.75x versus 6.86x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 20.78%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.86, signalling upside risk potential of 8.46%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $184.26 which suggests that it could grow by 39.23%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.513%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Oracle's PE ratio is 31.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 23.75x versus 6.78x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.