AVAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 9.49%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $230.74, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $559.61 which suggests that it could grow by 10.53%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.791%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.02x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.56x versus 1.71x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 7.33%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $230.74, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $136.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than RTX.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.306%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.02x while RTX's PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.56x versus 2.14x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe Pro Group has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of -371.8%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat Safe Pro Group's return on equity of --.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $230.74, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Safe Pro Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Safe Pro Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Safe Pro Group.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe Pro Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe Pro Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe Pro Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are larger than Safe Pro Group quarterly revenues of $307.7K. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is higher than Safe Pro Group's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.02x while Safe Pro Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.56x versus 28.50x for Safe Pro Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 6.51%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat Textron's return on equity of 12.66%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $230.74, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $93.93 which suggests that it could grow by 15.67%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Textron.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.963%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Textron offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are smaller than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.4B. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is lower than Textron's net income of $223M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.02x while Textron's PE ratio is 17.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.56x versus 1.12x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.