WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Home Depot has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 7.55%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat The Home Depot's return on equity of 375.6%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.16%. On the other hand The Home Depot has an analysts' consensus of $430.41 which suggests that it could grow by 16.05%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than The Home Depot, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than The Home Depot.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Home Depot has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.855%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.71%. The Home Depot offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.30 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than The Home Depot quarterly revenues of $39.7B. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than The Home Depot's net income of $3B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while The Home Depot's PE ratio is 24.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.30x versus 2.31x for The Home Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 11.19%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.16%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $57.59 which suggests that it could grow by 47.53%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.668%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.71%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.30x versus 2.55x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 9.17%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.16%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $326.27 which suggests that it could grow by 15.77%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Tesla.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.71%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Tesla's PE ratio is 138.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.30x versus 10.12x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 4.97%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 16.59%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.16%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $22.89 which suggests that it could grow by 56.77%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.751%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.71%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $494.7M. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 26.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.30x versus 0.67x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.