SLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Medical Properties Trust has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of -178.07%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -39.12%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.71%. On the other hand Medical Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could fall by -6.94%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Medical Properties Trust, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Medical Properties Trust.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.214%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Medical Properties Trust offers a yield of 9.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Properties Trust pays out -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are larger than Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $231.8M. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is higher than Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$412.8M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 731.00x while Medical Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.50x versus 3.56x for Medical Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 58.11%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.44%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.71%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $129.70 which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Prologis.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.608%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SL Green Realty's is not.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.2B. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1.3B. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 731.00x while Prologis's PE ratio is 28.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.50x versus 13.06x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 23.21%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.69%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.71%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.84 which suggests that it could grow by 6.83%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Regency Centers.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.334%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $372.5M. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $86.5M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 731.00x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 35.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.50x versus 9.41x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 5.41%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.21%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.71%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $165.16 which suggests that it could grow by 7.89%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Welltower.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.829%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.2B. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Welltower's net income of $120M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 731.00x while Welltower's PE ratio is 98.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.50x versus 11.86x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.