RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of 14.51%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 21.75%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.53, signalling upside risk potential of 100.54%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $47.26 which suggests that it could grow by 67.41%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Devon Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Devon Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.067%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Transocean's net income of $7M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $639M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.59x versus 1.12x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of 29.06%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.53, signalling upside risk potential of 100.54%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $200.20 which suggests that it could grow by 55.19%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.265%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Transocean's net income of $7M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.59x versus 2.50x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1621.32%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Leopard Energy's return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.53, signalling upside risk potential of 100.54%. On the other hand Leopard Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Leopard Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy has a beta of -0.095, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.472%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are larger than Leopard Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5K. Transocean's net income of $7M is higher than Leopard Energy's net income of -$24.3K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.59x versus 32.44x for Leopard Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1.88%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.53, signalling upside risk potential of 100.54%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $55.12 which suggests that it could grow by 46.31%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Transocean's net income of $7M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 15.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.59x versus 1.36x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.