RCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of -6.21%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 45.86% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $273.94, signalling upside risk potential of 42.67%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $58.85 which suggests that it could grow by 34.87%. Given that Royal Caribbean Group has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Royal Caribbean Group is more attractive than General Motors.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.265, which suggesting that the stock is 126.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $552M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.89x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.21x versus 0.26x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 11.19%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 45.86% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $273.94, signalling upside risk potential of 42.67%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $57.42 which suggests that it could grow by 78.93%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.265, which suggesting that the stock is 126.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.668%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $552M is higher than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.89x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 16.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.21x versus 2.09x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 12.07%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 45.86% beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 116.2%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $273.94, signalling upside risk potential of 42.67%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.68 which suggests that it could grow by 81.89%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.265, which suggesting that the stock is 126.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.614%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $552M is higher than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $254.5M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.89x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 8.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.21x versus 0.85x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 13.88%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 45.86% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $273.94, signalling upside risk potential of 42.67%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $281.25 which suggests that it could grow by 42.1%. Given that Royal Caribbean Group has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Royal Caribbean Group is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.265, which suggesting that the stock is 126.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.826%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $552M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.89x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 18.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.21x versus 1.83x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.