PPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DTE Energy has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 16.41%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat DTE Energy's return on equity of 13.72%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand DTE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $136.54 which suggests that it could grow by 13.12%. Given that DTE Energy has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe DTE Energy is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DTE Energy has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.283%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. DTE Energy offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. DTE Energy pays out 53.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than DTE Energy quarterly revenues of $2.9B. PPL's net income of $214M is lower than DTE Energy's net income of $477M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while DTE Energy's PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 2.02x for DTE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 7.96%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat NiSource's return on equity of 8.09%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $38.12 which suggests that it could grow by 4.57%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than NiSource.

PPL has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.282%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than NiSource quarterly revenues of $1.1B. PPL's net income of $214M is higher than NiSource's net income of $85.7M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while NiSource's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 3.11x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinnacle West Capital has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 22.33%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat Pinnacle West Capital's return on equity of 9.58%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand Pinnacle West Capital has an analysts' consensus of $92.02 which suggests that it could grow by 10.06%. Given that Pinnacle West Capital has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Pinnacle West Capital is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinnacle West Capital has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.918%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Pinnacle West Capital offers a yield of 4.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital pays out 77.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Pinnacle West Capital quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PPL's net income of $214M is lower than Pinnacle West Capital's net income of $395M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while Pinnacle West Capital's PE ratio is 15.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 1.92x for Pinnacle West Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 18.72%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $71.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.03%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.9%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. PPL's net income of $214M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 19.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 2.69x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.