MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 32.41%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $83.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.59 which suggests that it could grow by 11.1%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.572%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.05x versus 1.38x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 9.07%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $83.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $145.10 which suggests that it could grow by 3.82%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.423%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.05x versus 2.35x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 21.16%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $83.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $176.89 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.05x versus 4.88x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 3.36%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $83.27, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $99.63 which suggests that it could grow by 61.68%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.002%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.11x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.05x versus 0.60x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.