JNPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Arista Networks has a net margin of 11.54% compared to Juniper Networks's net margin of 41.49%. Juniper Networks's return on equity of 6.29% beat Arista Networks's return on equity of 33.36%.

Juniper Networks has a consensus price target of $39.89, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand Arista Networks has an analysts' consensus of $110.56 which suggests that it could grow by 52.14%. Given that Arista Networks has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe Arista Networks is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arista Networks has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.276%.

Juniper Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Arista Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Juniper Networks pays 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Arista Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Juniper Networks quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Arista Networks quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Juniper Networks's net income of $162M is lower than Arista Networks's net income of $801M. Notably, Juniper Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.73x while Arista Networks's PE ratio is 32.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Juniper Networks is 2.29x versus 13.29x for Arista Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cisco Systems has a net margin of 11.54% compared to Juniper Networks's net margin of 17.35%. Juniper Networks's return on equity of 6.29% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12%.

Juniper Networks has a consensus price target of $39.89, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.22%. Given that Cisco Systems has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe Cisco Systems is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.432%.

Juniper Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Juniper Networks pays 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Juniper Networks's is not.

Juniper Networks quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $14B. Juniper Networks's net income of $162M is lower than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Juniper Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.73x while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 25.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Juniper Networks is 2.29x versus 4.26x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a net margin of 11.54% compared to Juniper Networks's net margin of 7.98%. Juniper Networks's return on equity of 6.29% beat Hewlett Packard Enterprise's return on equity of 12.2%.

Juniper Networks has a consensus price target of $39.89, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand Hewlett Packard Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of $19.48 which suggests that it could grow by 37.74%. Given that Hewlett Packard Enterprise has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe Hewlett Packard Enterprise is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.104%.

Juniper Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Hewlett Packard Enterprise offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Juniper Networks pays 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise pays out 26.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Juniper Networks's is not.

Juniper Networks quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Hewlett Packard Enterprise quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Juniper Networks's net income of $162M is lower than Hewlett Packard Enterprise's net income of $627M. Notably, Juniper Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.73x while Hewlett Packard Enterprise's PE ratio is 6.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Juniper Networks is 2.29x versus 0.62x for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of 11.54% compared to Juniper Networks's net margin of 3.26%. Juniper Networks's return on equity of 6.29% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

Juniper Networks has a consensus price target of $39.89, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 71.33%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.639%.

Juniper Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Immersion offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Juniper Networks pays 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Juniper Networks's is not.

Juniper Networks quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. Juniper Networks's net income of $162M is higher than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Juniper Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.73x while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Juniper Networks is 2.29x versus 0.19x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.