HRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Campbell Soup has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 6.44%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat Campbell Soup's return on equity of 13.49%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Campbell Soup has an analysts' consensus of $43.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.18%. Given that Campbell Soup has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Campbell Soup is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.315, which suggesting that the stock is 68.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.226%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Campbell Soup offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Campbell Soup pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Campbell Soup quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is lower than Campbell Soup's net income of $173M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.03x while Campbell Soup's PE ratio is 21.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.39x versus 1.10x for Campbell Soup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 12.92%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.53 which suggests that it could grow by 10.73%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.315, which suggesting that the stock is 68.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.046%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.03x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.39x versus 1.62x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 5.4%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 28.51%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $49.57 which suggests that it could fall by -7.07%. Given that Hormel Foods has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Hormel Foods is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.315, which suggesting that the stock is 68.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.831%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is lower than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $235.9M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.03x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 11.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.39x versus 0.71x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 2.64%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.02, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $67.34 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.315, which suggesting that the stock is 68.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.538%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M is lower than Tyson Foods's net income of $359M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.03x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.39x versus 0.40x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.