CHRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forward Air has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -5.75%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -132.48%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $113.04, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $31.75 which suggests that it could grow by 134.84%. Given that Forward Air has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Forward Air is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.007%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $632.8M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$36.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.15x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.5%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.33%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $113.04, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.38 which suggests that it could grow by 30.49%. Given that Hub Group has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Hub Group is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.428%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $973.5M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Hub Group's net income of $24.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.51x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.45%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $113.04, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 68.1%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.749%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 20.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -69.07%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $113.04, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1135.35%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.609%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Singularity Future Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues of $474.6K. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.70x while Singularity Future Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 1.06x for Singularity Future Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.