CAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of -25.36%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $390.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $195.81 which suggests that it could grow by 21.01%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.692%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Boeing quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Boeing's net income of -$3.9B. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.39x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.56x versus 1.57x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Columbus McKinnon has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 1.69%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 1.06%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $390.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Columbus McKinnon has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 85.39%. Given that Columbus McKinnon has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Columbus McKinnon is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.161%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Columbus McKinnon offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Columbus McKinnon quarterly revenues of $234.1M. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Columbus McKinnon's net income of $4M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.39x while Columbus McKinnon's PE ratio is 55.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.56x versus 0.54x for Columbus McKinnon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 10.52%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $390.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $492.57 which suggests that it could grow by 3.16%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Deere &.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.365%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.39x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.56x versus 2.80x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gencor Industries has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 10.01%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Gencor Industries's return on equity of 8.69%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $390.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Gencor Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.49%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Gencor Industries, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Gencor Industries.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gencor Industries has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.749%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Gencor Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Gencor Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Gencor Industries quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Gencor Industries's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.39x while Gencor Industries's PE ratio is 16.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.56x versus 1.68x for Gencor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.