QIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -- compared to Quality Industrial's net margin of -20.76%. Quality Industrial's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Quality Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quality Industrial has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Quality Industrial is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.514, which suggesting that the stock is 451.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.

Quality Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Quality Industrial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Quality Industrial quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Quality Industrial's net income of -- is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Quality Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quality Industrial is 0.05x versus 0.52x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Quality Industrial's net margin of 12.78%. Quality Industrial's return on equity of -- beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29%.

Quality Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.06%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.514, which suggesting that the stock is 451.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.742%.

Quality Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Quality Industrial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend.

Quality Industrial quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $99.4M. Quality Industrial's net income of -- is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M. Notably, Quality Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 39.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quality Industrial is 0.05x versus 0.94x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Quality Industrial's net margin of 2.35%. Quality Industrial's return on equity of -- beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

Quality Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -37.35%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.514, which suggesting that the stock is 451.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.49%.

Quality Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Quality Industrial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quality Industrial quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Quality Industrial's net income of -- is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Quality Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 19.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quality Industrial is 0.05x versus 0.19x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of -- compared to Quality Industrial's net margin of 0.5%. Quality Industrial's return on equity of -- beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Quality Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $34.19 which suggests that it could grow by 6.46%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.514, which suggesting that the stock is 451.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quality Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quality Industrial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quality Industrial quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Quality Industrial's net income of -- is lower than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Quality Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quality Industrial is 0.05x versus 1.70x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.