PSIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of 0.21%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 504.53% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 163.34%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.678%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $125.8M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Power Solutions International's net income of $17.3M is higher than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.79x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.72x versus 0.25x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of 2.48%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 504.53% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 295.06%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.025%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $125.8M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Power Solutions International's net income of $17.3M is higher than CVD Equipment's net income of $203K. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.79x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.72x versus 1.17x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of -161.83%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 504.53% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Power Solutions International has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Power Solutions International is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $125.8M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Power Solutions International's net income of $17.3M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.79x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.72x versus 3.58x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of 0.25%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 504.53% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 311.83%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $125.8M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Power Solutions International's net income of $17.3M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.79x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.72x versus 0.18x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.