PROSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koninklijke KPN NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of 16.51%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koninklijke KPN NV has an analysts' consensus of $3.60 which suggests that it could fall by -19.28%. Given that Koninklijke KPN NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Koninklijke KPN NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.364%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Koninklijke KPN NV offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke KPN NV pays out 76.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while Koninklijke KPN NV's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.08x versus 3.03x for Koninklijke KPN NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of -360.42%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -5.76%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 155.7%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.55%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $37.9M. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$136.6M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.08x versus 49.95x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of --. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 57.01%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prosus NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Prosus NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 44.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 21.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.08x versus 3.88x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.