HTHIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 6.75%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 35.1%. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.03%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.753%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.58x versus 0.67x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -3.6%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 35.1%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.57 which suggests that it could fall by -0.07%. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than Kyocera.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.775%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 51.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.58x versus 1.20x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of --. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 35.1%. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.58x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 9.53%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.56%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 35.1%. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than SECOM.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.464, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while SECOM's PE ratio is 21.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.58x versus 2.80x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.