HTHIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -3.6%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.40 which suggests that it could grow by 5.46%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.775%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 48.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.56x versus 1.12x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of --. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.56x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 5.34%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 86.34%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 7.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.56x versus 1.51x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.